Big Story, Latest News

Kano Emirate Crisis: Bashir Tofa, Usman Bugaje, other elders tackle Ganduje, seek Buhari’s intervention

Prominent personalities under the auspices of ‘Friends of Democracy’ have expressed concern over the ongoing crisis in Kano State, following the creation of new emirates by the state government.

In a statement jointly signed by Bashir Tofa, Dr. Usman Bugaje, Dr. Abubakar Siddique Mohammed, Bashir Yusuf Ibrahim, Bilya Bala, Hubert Shaiyen and, Prof. Jibrin Ibrahim which was seen by Daily Nierian, they warned that the new policy could lead to a breakdown of social cohesion and unity in the state.

According to them, the creation of new emirates could lead to the politicization of traditional authority in the state, adding that violence might erupt due to popular opposition to the new emirate structure.

The group, therefore, called on Governor Abdullahi Ganduje to rescind on his decision and, “harken to the voices of moderation by closely working with the House of Assembly, Traditional Rulers and Elders.”

While calling on the State Assembly to reconvene and trigger the legislative process of holding public hearings in the interest of peace, the group also called on President Muhammadu Buhari to call Governor Ganduje to order, “to speedily engage on the reversal process.”

“It should be noted that a minor eruption of violence from Kano can easily conflagrate the region and possibly, the country.

“People are angry at various levels and for various reasons, and some may use this as an opportunity to vent their anger.

“The Federal Government and, particularly, the Presidency should treat this matter with the seriousness it deserves,” the statement read in part.

The statement read further: “We are extremely concerned about the on-going crisis in Kano following the creation of new Emirates by the government.

“It would be recalled that on Monday 6th May, one Ibrahim Salisu, representing a civil society group had submitted a petition to the Kano State House of Assembly seeking for the decentralisation of the Kano Emirate.

“The petitioner demanded the upgrade of the traditional rulers of Karaye, Bichi, Rano, and Gaya to the status of first-class emirs and the creation of additional emirates in Kano.

“The Assembly was recalled from recess and immediately reconvened by the Speaker.

“Between Monday and Wednesday, the Bill had been crafted, passed through three readings, adopted and signed into law by the governor.

“By the end of the week, new Emirs were appointed and issued their letters and instruments of authority.

“By this action, Kano lost its status as one of only two states in Nigeria with one emirate or traditional council. Sokoto, the seat of the Sultan of Sokoto, is the other state with a similar arrangement.

“The law removed 36 of Kano’s 44 local government areas from the Kano Emirate to create the four new emirates – Rano, Gaya, Karaye and Bichi.

“Rano Emirate covers 10 local government councils – These are Rano, Bunkure, Kibiya, Takai, Sumaila, Kura, Doguwa, Tudunwada, Kiru and Bebeji.

“Gaya Emirate has nine local government councils consisting of Gaya, Ajingi, Albasu, Wudil, Garko, Warawa, Dawakinkudu, Gabasawa and Gezawa.

“Karaye Emirate has eight local government councils – Karaye, Rogo, Gwarzo, Kabo, Rimingado, Shanono, Madobi and Garunmalam.

“Bichi Emirate has nine local government areas – Bichi, Bagwai, Tsanyawa, Shanono, Kunchi, Dambatta, Makoda, Dawakintofa and Tofa

“We believe that such an important matter should have been subjected to very wide consultations and deep consideration before action was taken.

“Precipitate action should be avoided in the governance of delicate issues. In particular, the people should have been consulted on whether they wanted a restructuring of their Emirate.

“We note for example that citizens in Wudil after a stakeholders’ meeting on Sunday have expressed their opposition to the restructuring policy and appealed to the State Government to return them to the old Kano Emirate where they rightly belong.

“According to their statement, the current arrangement is not backed by historical antecedents and is of no benefit to the affected communities.

“They stated categorically that: “We cannot afford to exist under Gaya Emirate.” They added that their desire is to remain under Kano.”

Leave a Reply